10 Essential Cloud Migration Insights

Cloud Migration Services

In search of everything from cost savings to faster releases and more innovation, modern enterprise software shops are busy working to migrate their on-premise applications and other workloads to the public cloud.

Amidst all the excitement and demand for remote working, we asked Cloud experts in Claritus Consulting (from product folks to cloud evangelists) for their thoughts on the overlooked essentials of an enterprise cloud migration. Here are their insights:

At the most basic level, cloud migration is all about getting things out of bare-metal virtual machines and into cloud instances. There may be some immediate cost benefits to that, but the real journey toward modern software efficiency doesn’t even begin until you get to the cloud. The real goal is to adopt cloud services to speed development, enable teams to manage infrastructure more autonomously, and ultimately improve your customer experience. Early, comprehensive monitoring is essential to that digital transformation, which is when you actually reap the full benefits of moving to the cloud.

Don’t miss:

For many companies, a successful cloud migration requires a cultural shift even more profound than the technology changes. If after your migration you’re still doing your same dev methodology, but just doing it “in the cloud,” you aren’t going to get the great leaps in productivity you’re looking for. According to AWS principal John Enoch, as quoted in , “those organizations that have a business plan and can communicate together as teams get really good results and those that can’t don’t.”

One of the most common reasons why companies move to the cloud is to help implement DevOps practices. And one of the most common reasons why companies implement DevOps practices is to help them move to the cloud. Chicken, meet egg. Or maybe, chocolate, meet peanut butter.

One of the cloud’s big advantages is the opportunity it offers to provision resources faster and more dynamically to meet real-time demands. That can help save money on unused infrastructure and alleviate the short-term pain of frustrated developers waiting for servers. Properly managed, smaller, less comprehensive, more frequent deploys can actually be more stable. But a cascade of poorly managed deploys with short lead times can result in chaos. Companies need to institute processes to manage and optimize the tension between speed and stability in cloud environments. That means ensuring parity between staging and production environments, properly validating all changes, incorporating modern deployment approaches such as blue/green and canary deployments, and-of course-advanced monitoring techniques.

When selecting a vendor to help you monitor cloud applications, you have to ensure it offers code-level visibility. Why? Because public cloud vendors are driving customers to embed “infrastructure as code” into their applications. So deep visibility into applications is becoming a critical component of understanding infrastructure health and cost. Infrastructure metrics alone are critical, but not enough for the future.

How do you decide whether to lift-and-shift an application into the cloud, or refactor it to take better advantage of capabilities available only in the cloud. The answer? It depends. Consider each of the six Rs of cloud migration strategy (rehost, replatform, repurchase, refactor, retire, and retain) on a case-by-case basis. For instance, if your team is struggling to maintain its database servers, you might want to consider refactoring to use a cloud database as a service offering. That can help reduce the need to for database server maintenance, patching, and so on.

Your cloud migration doesn’t have to be a blind leap. There are many tools to help you with planning, discovery, and tracking each step of your migration. Use these tools to take inventory, build a pre-migration business case, perform migration readiness, plan the actual migration of workloads and data, and validate that your migration was successful.

Don’t miss:

Many times when companies migrate applications to the cloud, they look only at infrastructure consumption metrics (CPU usage, disk I/O, etc.) but never at end-user experience metrics (response time, error rate, etc.) that show how the application is actually performing. That makes it hard to answer questions about whether the migration was “successful” or not. To truly understand the results of a migration, you mustlook at app performance in depth in addition to cloud infrastructure health.

For a cost-effective cloud migration, it’s critical to include instrumentation as early as possible in the process. For example, a recent research has shown that implementing proper instrumentation before you begin your migration can save you from 16% to 25% of your total migration costs. Without pre-migration benchmarking, it’s difficult to determine operational parity post migration, so cloud migrations can end up running parallel environments far longer than expected.

Put simply, spending 48 hours instrumenting your systems before a cloud migration can save 3 months or more of migration time.

An often under-appreciated element of moving from on-premise applications to cloud-based applications is not technical, but financial. The two approaches use radically different expense models. On-premise infrastructure costs are usually considered capital expenses (CapEx) while cloud service costs are typically accounted for as operating expenses (OpEx). That difference doesn’t usually affect the overall impact on the bottom line, but it can be a big deal to the CFO and the accountants who have to make the numbers come out right.

Claritus, a global mobile and web application development services company with 250+ app developers to design apps. https://www.claritusconsulting.com/